ESS distribution of display duration in animal contests to assess an opponent before fighting or fleeing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Questions: What determines the duration of conventional display in animal contests? Mathematical method: Evolutionarily stable probability distribution of display duration is calculated mathematically. Key assumptions: Display lasts until one of the contestants chooses to fight or flee. The outcome of fighting between two contestants is determined by their relative strength, which is unknown at the beginning but becomes more and more apparent to both contestants with time. Conclusions: The ESS population may include individuals with very different display durations. The more valuable the contested resource and the greater the cost of losing a contest, the longer the display lasts. Animals that assess their opponents with very high or very low efficiency will engage in shorter displays than animals with intermediate assessment efficiency.
منابع مشابه
Agonistic Behavior and Acoustic Communication
Sounds are uttered in agonistic contexts by representatives of 30+ families of fishes but this number mainly reflects the scientific expenditure and less so the actual distribution of soundproducing families. Sounds are emitted in numerous contexts: distressful or disturbancesituations, e.g. being attacked or grabbed by predators, competitive feeding, and competition for space and sometimes mat...
متن کاملWhat Determines the Duration of War? Insights from Assessment Strategies in Animal Contests
Interstate wars and animal contests both involve disputed resources, restraint and giving up decisions. In both cases it seems illogical for the weaker side to persist in the conflict if it will eventually lose. In the case of animal contests analyses of the links between opponent power and contest duration have provided insights into what sources of information are available to fighting animal...
متن کاملAssessment strategies and fighting patterns in animal contests: a role for serotonin?
Accurate assessment of the probability of success in an aggressive confrontation with a conspecific is critical to the survival and fitness of the individuals. Various game theory models have examined these assessment strategies under the assumption that contests should favor the animal with the greater resource-holding potential (RHP), body size typically being the proxy. Mutual assessment ass...
متن کاملSignalling victory to ensure dominance: a continuous model
A possible rationale for victory displays—which are performed by the winners of contests but not by the losers—is that the displays are attempts to decrease the probability that the loser of a contest will initiate a future contest with the same individual. We explore the logic of this “browbeating” rationale with a game-theoretic model, which extends previous work by incorporating the effects ...
متن کاملThe role of skill in animal contests: a neglected component of fighting ability.
What attributes make some individuals more likely to win a fight than others? A range of morphological and physiological traits have been studied intensely but far less focus has been placed on the actual agonistic behaviours used. Current studies of agonistic behaviour focus on contest duration and the vigour of fighting. It also seems obvious that individuals that fight more skilfully should ...
متن کامل